<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PayPerPost: The Sidewalk Hookers of the Blogosphere(tm)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baron.vc/payperpost-the-sidewalk-hookers-of-the-blogospheretm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baron.vc/payperpost-the-sidewalk-hookers-of-the-blogospheretm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:02:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindspeakr</title>
		<link>http://baron.vc/payperpost-the-sidewalk-hookers-of-the-blogospheretm/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindspeakr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baron.vc/payperpost-the-sidewalk-hookers-of-the-blogospheretm/#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Thx.  I see no problem with Scoble taking an honorarium at all because he fully disclosed.  I was disappointed to see him cave on that aspect of participation.  And even if he had chosen not to disclose, these things have a way of surfacing.  

I&#039;m a big believer in transparency too - it&#039;s why I use the same username across all sites where I register - even if the site would be considered a competitor to the company I work for.  In my view, it&#039;s just the right way to operate.  

I don&#039;t believe in &quot;collective wisdom&quot; and in fact think it&#039;s dangerous on a number of levels.  I&#039;m interested in what the majority thinks, but I don&#039;t make decisions around it.  Then again, I enjoy socializing in person and on the net with smart people - and smart folks typically aren&#039;t afraid to go against the mob mentality and march to their own drum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx.  I see no problem with Scoble taking an honorarium at all because he fully disclosed.  I was disappointed to see him cave on that aspect of participation.  And even if he had chosen not to disclose, these things have a way of surfacing.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big believer in transparency too &#8211; it&#8217;s why I use the same username across all sites where I register &#8211; even if the site would be considered a competitor to the company I work for.  In my view, it&#8217;s just the right way to operate.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe in &#8220;collective wisdom&#8221; and in fact think it&#8217;s dangerous on a number of levels.  I&#8217;m interested in what the majority thinks, but I don&#8217;t make decisions around it.  Then again, I enjoy socializing in person and on the net with smart people &#8211; and smart folks typically aren&#8217;t afraid to go against the mob mentality and march to their own drum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baron</title>
		<link>http://baron.vc/payperpost-the-sidewalk-hookers-of-the-blogospheretm/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>baron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 21:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baron.vc/payperpost-the-sidewalk-hookers-of-the-blogospheretm/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>I agree with you so much.  If you compulsively buy anything you see on infomercials, that&#039;s an individual&#039;s choice.  Even if there was no disclosure your gut should tell you if something&#039;s not right.  Unless it&#039;s an outright scam I don&#039;t see the issue, just shut them out.  I think it&#039;s unfair for A-list bloggers to wield their influence to try and crush new monetization opportunities before the dust settles.  It&#039;s easy to be ethical when you have a good cash flow.  Not everyone has the same opportunities.

However, I&#039;m all for more transparency.  I just say let the audience demand it and not have the top 5% of the blogosphere call the shots.  It&#039;s a free market and blogging&#039;s still a new medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you so much.  If you compulsively buy anything you see on infomercials, that&#8217;s an individual&#8217;s choice.  Even if there was no disclosure your gut should tell you if something&#8217;s not right.  Unless it&#8217;s an outright scam I don&#8217;t see the issue, just shut them out.  I think it&#8217;s unfair for A-list bloggers to wield their influence to try and crush new monetization opportunities before the dust settles.  It&#8217;s easy to be ethical when you have a good cash flow.  Not everyone has the same opportunities.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m all for more transparency.  I just say let the audience demand it and not have the top 5% of the blogosphere call the shots.  It&#8217;s a free market and blogging&#8217;s still a new medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

